Anyone familiar with the literature knows that there are great pedagogical differences between one-on-one tutoring and teaching in a classroom. This makes sense, since in a classroom environment the teacher is trying to enable learning in 30 individuals at the same time, where varied approaches to reach different learning styles must be taken, and information must be delivered on multiple levels so that all the students can acquire knowledge, even if at multiple levels.
With on-on-one tutoring, however, the approach is much different. If I know a student is going to be working with me long-term, use of a learning style/multiple intelligence assessment, such as the Index of Learning Styles, or personality type test, like the Jung-Myers-Briggs test, is very useful to determine how the student is likely to acquire knowledge. I have also found that an enneagram test can help determine approaches that might be suited for the individual student. After the individual’s learning style has been determined, the tutor can better shape instruction to favor the student’s individual learning style. Using a varied approach is still helpful to help expand the student’s abilities and keep interest levels high, but by focusing on the students learning style, the tutor can maximize knowledge acquisition.
Tailoring the instruction and tutoring sessions to the student’s learning style and personality type is only part of the difference. With one-on-one tutoring, the instructor does not have to present information on various levels, but instead can meet the student where they are at through an initial assessment. As the tutor works continuously with the student, they can also identify further strengths and weaknesses as they learn what the student struggles with and more easily acquires. While teachers in a classroom environment also learn what particular weaknesses an individual student might have through errors on homework and tests, they must use a constant time/benefit analysis to determine how much to focus on that particular issue for the individual student and the needs of the greater class. The tutor does not have this problem; he or she can quickly determine the student’s weakness and devote extra energies to correcting it without hindering the rest of the learning process. For example, building in a review of a weak area each session or giving some take-home problems allows the tutor to address the student’s deficiency over time, even if moving on to other areas.
Tutoring is teaching, if teaching is “enabling learning.” However, teaching is not tutoring, which is a personalized and effective approach to knowledge acquisition. Check back for more about one-on-one tutoring pedagogy in the upcoming days.
Recent Comments